Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Science vs. Literature
Sometimes, the lines between science and literature get a little fuzzy. How? Check these out: Literature as a graph and one that cracks me up: Fictional Physicists (the titles were slightly paraphrased). What do you think? Has science become literature or has literature become scientific?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Personally, I feel that literature has become more scientific rather than science becoming literature. Because it doesn't really make sense that science is becoming more scientific. If so, how would that make sense? Instead, if you really look into, it, literature has become more scientific. For example, articles are a form of literature, and believe me, there are a LOT more science articles today than there were, say, 10 years ago. But how would you say that science has become literaturer?
ReplyDeleteI feel Literature and science are like brother and sister. If one wasn't there the other would mourn for the dead. What I mean is that in science is a type of Literture. For example there are books about science. And science is a type of Literture because without reading, writing there'd be nothing in this world. Ohhh creepy. If you want to be a scientist you need to be a good communicator, writer(taking notes), and reader. You could even say their twins. Cool new to think about science and literure. I think science rocks especially when we learn about different types of rocks. Ha get it! okay corny yeah whatever. But I just mixed corny science with corny literture which equals a positive. Okay I'm confused, maybe i should rest.
ReplyDelete